Bite-size training
Background
Even when the lawyer attends the course, typical
responses will include:
- "The training wasn't relevant"
- "I didn't learn anything"
- "The training was too long"
- "It wasn't worth the money"
|
The dilemma facing most training and development managers
is that they have to balance the competency gaps of
the lawyers with the real-world pressure on fee-earners
time. This is compounded by most lawyers’ disdain
for training, and the ability to cancel scheduled training
commitments at short notice.
That’s why we have developed “bite-sized
training” for law firms, to address these issues:
"The training wasn't relevant"
Each session has an accompanying 10 item questionnaire
so that the individual lawyer can decide whether s/he
should attend the programme. The questions are linked
to the learning outcomes of the session, so by attending
the course the lawyer WILL address the areas covered
by the questionnaire.
The training sessions are run by people who have real-world
experience of the subjects covered. For example the
sales sessions are delivered by someone with experience
of selling within professional services, the leadership
sessions by someone who has led in a partnership environment.
The trainers have credibility and gravitas.
The sessions are also designed to allow delegates to
work on their real-life problems – whether their
own current to-do list or a particular client they want
to get more work from. Material is designed to deliver
key ideas in practical ways that allow immediate implementation
and measurable results.
The training materials can be tailored to make sure
that the terminology is correct for your firm; titles
are correct, and departments, teams and management groups
will have the correct nomenclature.
"I didn't learn anything"
The pre-course questionnaire gives a frank overview
of the subjects covered, so delegates are clear on the
subject matter and the level at which it will be covered
– from big picture overview to minor detail tips
and tricks.
The same pre-course questionnaire can be used 3 months
later to gauge what the individual attendee says s/he
now says about his/her competency in the areas covered
in the programme.
The sessions promote word-of-mouth recommendations.
Being short and pragmatic means that the lawyers’
return on investment is quickly realised, and more lawyers
tend to attend subsequent programmes.
"The training was long"
Each session is just 100 minutes. Because it is so
short, the session is focused and punchy – no
lengthy delegate introductions, and no irrelevant time-filling.
A great deal can, however, be covered in 100 minutes
including working on real-life problems and skills development.
The 100 minute format allows four separate sessions
per day - and you choose the topics. This means that
a diverse range of subject can be covered in one day,
allowing the maximum number of lawyers to experience
training in areas they believe are important, whilst
keeping the cost per delegate down.
"It wasn't worth the money"
Because the sessions require only minor modification
for each firm, there are no design costs involved. Thus
a day containing 4 sessions (for example time management,
building a professional network, project management
and giving feedback) costs just £2000 + VAT plus
travel expenses. There are reductions should you require
just 2 or 3 sessions in a day.
Assuming just 12 lawyers attend each session (and we
can accommodate up to 20), the cost per lawyer session
is about £50/head. By minimising the time spent
away from fee-earning we are also making corresponding
savings on chargeable hours.
Next >>
Examples of bite-size training
|