Blog

Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Telling the client the price

  
  
  
  

describe the imageI have encountered very few partners who enjoy discussing money with the client.  I know one  partner - now a managing parter - who kept (and perhaps still keeps?) a list of billing targets in his top pocket.  But he is unusual. It is ironic that a profession which has the closest form of naked capitalism I can think of (selling time for money) as its basic metric finds it so difficult to establish, communicate and defend price. 

I believe the problem is that the typical partner sees the (a) internal costing and (b) pricing for the client as 2 separate processes which need to take place before we interact with the client.  So our preferred style is to absorb information, consider consequences, calculate internal costs and then establish a price which we believe that is both fair and the client will pay.  Then we tell the client.  Usually via email.

This is poor practice for any salesperson.  A client wants to know how much something might cost at the time he is considering making the decision.  The cost forms part of the decision-making process, so needs to be discussed with the professional who will provide the service (i.e. you).  In an ideal world the client would respond to your carefully-worded email sent 24 hours after the meeting with a well-crafted reply.  In the real world they may not read your response for some days, in which time they have met other people, considered other priorities and forgotten the rapport which you had built with them.

The solution is to raise the price issue upfront, when you initially talk to the client, because even if the client doesn't mention it, you know they are thinking about it.  You can then frame the price in terms of the work they want done, and explore other options which would change the price.

If you find the whole idea of discussing price uncomfortable, you should read the white paper on "The 10 step process to discussing money with the client."  Once you get the hang of it it becomes both lucrative and useful in building client loyalty.

 

  download-whitepaper

Comments

How I deal with costs estimates depends in the first instance on whether this is a new or existing client.A client for whom I have acted before knows my charging rate and likely fees for the job in question but I always enlighten him/her accordingly at the outset-usually on the phone or by e mail before I send out my client care letter.A new client needs to be spoken to in some depth so as to get to know them suggesting they come in to talk about the proposed transaction.Once face to face I go through the likely costs in detail and if he/she does not make a dash for the door I confirm the costs in writing.Only rarely do those who come into the office not engage the firm's services although occasionally we do agree to charge less than originally suggested.
Posted @ Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:10 AM by BILL JACKSON
I am blunt and up front withthe client. Given that I am either conducting litigation, so I give a "band between" estimate,or drafting or advocacy, so quoting a fixed fee, I see no reason why I should hide it. 
 
yet even though I am up front in the initial interview, put it clearly in my retainer letter, update them regularly and amd notoriously light with the red pen i still have problems with getting the money when (as happens in most matters at some point) the work carried out exceeds the amount held on account. 
 
Clients just cannot see they need to pay for the service thay get. If there is something we need out here it is a way to show the value we bring and overcome the "fat cat" epithets applied by the politicians and teh gutter press.
Posted @ Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:31 AM by Laurence St.Lyon
Thanks, Bill & Laurence. Building on your point, Bill, I think most of us would consider being flexible on price if the client was honest and told us that was the issue: often the client just goes quiet. You seem to have mastered this by getting committment whilst they are still with you, which works. I think for you, Laurence, the challenge is to find a different way of collecting more money rather than waiting for when the retainer runs out. I'm interested. Do you offer clients the opportunity to pay a standard sum a month into their client acocunt addition to the initial retainer, so that the ongoing litigation is less lumpy? Or have you investigated even more innovative ways to make the paying less problematic?
Posted @ Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:43 AM by Jamie Pennington
Comments have been closed for this article.